Sunday, August 9, 2009

POLITICAL FACTS

AT A GLANCE
By Jean C. Jacobs August 9, 2009

Let the record show the following: When I campaigned in Ward 5. I carried two flyer's that I designed and printed at Catskill Art Supply in an Electric Pink, which read as follows:
Flyer for Legislator:

THE PEOPLES CHOICE
ELECT JEAN JACOBS
REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR LEGISLATOR
DISTRICT 12 COUNTY OF ULSTER
I have been a volunteer for over 35 years serving the people of Ulster County and the City of Kingston. ”Together We Can Make a Difference"

Flyer for Alderman Primary:
PRIMARY ELECTION
TUESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 15, 2009
THE PEOPLES CHOICE
ELECT JEAN JACOBS
REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE
ALDERMAN WARD 5,
CITY OF KINGSTON
Everyone can make a difference when they exercise their right to vote for the Candidate that will make a difference in Ward 5. I ask for your support and VOTE for me as your Republican Alderman Candidate in the City of Kingston Republican Primary, on Tuesday September 15, 2009.
”Together we can Make a Difference”

FACT: Let me assure the public there was never fraud or deception in my campaign speech with the residents in Ward 5. They can support my statement when I visited their homes. I have never been or will be ashamed to serve my people. I will give you the list of the names and you can ask them directly, if there was ever a time that I deceived or mislead them.


FACT: On July 16, at 2:17 PM: Jean Jacobs turned into the Ulster County Board Of Elections the necessary amount of petition signatures required to run in the Republican Primary for Alderman in Ward 5 on Tuesday, September 15, 2009.


FACT: On July 16, 2009 at 2:17 PM: Jean Jacobs turned in only 8 signatures to run for Legislature in District 12, County of Ulster. Additional signatures carried by 3 committeemen out of 16 eligible to carry were a total of 12 signatures which was a grand total of 20. A total of 49 signatures were required to be a candidate for District 12 Legislator. Therefore from the very beginning the amount of signatures collected for Legislator District 12 for Jean Jacobs was not sufficient to run for office.


FACT: July 17, 2009 Jean Jacobs received a Memo from Thomas Turco, Commissioner and Ms. Kathy Mihm, stating that Pursuant to the provisions of the Section 6-144 of the New York State Education Law that through a petition filed in this office, that Jean Jacobs was nominated as a candidate for public office by the Republican Party, to be voted for at the Primary Election to be held on September 15, 2009. My acceptance was filed by the Board of Elections for this position. I never received an acceptance for County Legislator District 12

FACT: June 20, 2009 at 5:40 PM: I requested a statement while at the Board of Elections office as it relates to running for two positions: A member of the Board of Elections obtained this for me per my request. No County Legislator shall hold at any time any other elective public office.

FACT: July 20, 2009 Jean Jacobs states, “she did not hold any other elective public office position when she carried petitions for Republican Alderman Ward 5 and Republican Legislator District 12”.

FACT: July 20, 2009, SPECIFICATION OF OBJECTIONS filed by the Attorney for member of the community states the following objections: Whereas the undersigned did heretofore and on July 20, 2009 file with the Board of Elections of the County of Ulster, NY objections to the designating petition filed July 16, 2009 in the office of the Board of Elections of Ulster County, New York purporting that JEAN JACOBS , 139 Wall Street, Kingston, New York 12401 as a candidate of the Republican Party for the office of the Ulster County Legislator for District 12 to be voted on at the primary election t be held on September 15, 2009 ; NOW THEREFORE , the undersigned, pursuant to Section 6-154 of the Election Law of the State of New York and other provisions of the law applicable hereto, does hereby specify and amplify the following as grounds of their objections to said petition; to wit: (1) the petition is defective and void because it fails to comply with the provisions of Article 6 of the election law of the State of New York with respect to designating petitions in that it does not contain a sufficient number of valid signatures of voters duly registered and entitled to vote for the position of Legislator for District of the Ulster County Legislature and enrolled as members of the Republican Party. The petition contains 20 signatures of persons enrolled in the Republican Party and eligible to vote for the office of District 12 of the Ulster County Legislature. The minimum number of such enrolled voters of the Republican Party required to qualify a candidate for office is forty-nine (49). That said nomination or designation is therefore null and void.

FACT: On July 24, 2009: Mr. Richard T. Cahill Sr., a resident of Ward 5 in the City of Kingston, County of Ulster and State of New York filed objections to Jean Jacobs, petitions for Alderman in Ward 5, City of Kingston.

FACT: July 24, 2009 Jean Jacobs received another Memo from the Board of Elections from Commissioners Mr. Thomas Turco and Ms. Kathy Mihm stating that, please be advised that Specific Objections to your designating petitions have been filed with the Ulster County Board of Elections. A copy of said objections is hereby attached. A meeting of the Board of Elections will be convened on Tuesday July 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM.

FACT: On July 28, 2009: Jean Jacobs attended the Specific Objections meeting as it related to Designating petitions of Jean Jacobs for office of Alderman, Ward 5, City of Kingston. While I was in attendance at the meeting with the Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners the objection to my petitions for Ward 5 Alderman in the City of Kingston by Mr. Richard T. Cahill Sr. was unanimously denied. Therefore the petition is deemed valid.

FACT: On July 28, 2009: Jean Jacobs attended the Specific Objections meeting as it related to Designating petitions of Jean Jacobs for the office of Ulster County Legislator, District 12. A member of the community objected to the Republican Designating petition for the office of Ulster County Legislator District 12. The objection was unanimously upheld. Therefore the petition for legislator District 12 is deemed invalid.

FACT: On July 29, 2009: I received by mail a Memorandum from the Board of Elections Commissioner Thomas Turco and Commissioner Kathy Mihm stating that an appeal must be filed 3 days from this ruling that was made by the Board of Elections. The Board of Elections ruled in Jean Jacobs favor regarding Mr. Richard Cahill Sr., objection to the Republican Designating petition of Jean Jacobs for the office of Alderman, Ward 5, City of Kingston. THE OBJECTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY DENIED. Therefore the petition is deemed valid. Jean Jacobs Alderman petitions were deemed valid at this time and Jean Jacobs Legislature petitions did not have enough signatures to validate her candidacy for the position of Legislator in District 12 County of Ulster.

FACT: On July 28, 2009 while attending my monthly Republican Committee meeting I was served with papers by a Republican Committeemen while sitting at the meeting with fellow committeemen which stated as follows:. SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ULSTER Richard T. Cahill Sr. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE against THOMAS TURCO AND KATHLEEN MIHM As Commissioners of the Ulster County Board and Jean Jacobs :

FACT: July 29, 2009 Order to Show Cause filed by Mr. Richard T. Cahill Sr. Declares invalid the designating petitions filed on behalf of respondent JEAN JACOBS purporting to designate her as a candidate of the Republican Party for election to the public office of Alderman for Ward 5 of the City of Kingston at a primary election to take place on September,15, 2009.
1. Mandating that respondents THOMAS TURCO AND KATHY MIHM as Commissioners of the Ulster County Board of Elections, produce upon the hearing of this Order to Show Cause the aforesaid petition purporting to designate Respondent Jean Jacobs as a candidate of the Republican Party for election to the public office of Alderman for the 5 and the aforesaid petition purporting to designate Jean Jacobs as a candidate of the Republican Party at a primary election to take place, on September 15, 2009.


FACT: August 4, 2009: Jean Jacobs appeared in Supreme Court before the Honorable Judge.

FACT: August 4, 2009: Verified Answer: presented in Supreme Court by the Ulster County Attorney representing the Board of Elections. Verified Answer as Ulster County Attorney: Section 16-102 (2) of the Election Law requires that a Supreme Court “proceeding with respect to a petition shall be instituted within fourteen days after the last day to file a petition, or within three business days after the officer or board with whom or which such petition was filed makes a determination of invalidity with respect to such petition, whichever is later….” The last day to file Designating petitions was July 16, 2009. The Ulster County Board of Elections made its determination invalidating the Designating Petition of respondent Jean Jacobs for Ulster County Legislator on July 28, 2009. Thus, the last day to institute a PROCEEDING in Supreme Court regarding that determination was July 31st, 2009. That time has passed and respondent Jean Jacobs has failed to commence any proceedings whatsoever appealing that determination.


FACT: August 4, 2009: # (8) On the Verified Answer: Prepared by Ulster County Attorney : As the foregoing shows, Respondent, Jean Jacobs, is only running for one public office, that of Alderman of the City of Kingston, Ward 5. Thus the Petition herein is moot.

FACT: August 4, 2009: On the Verified Answer Prepared by the Ulster County Attorney Respondents Mr. Thomas Turco Board of Elections Commissioner and Ms. Kathy Mihm Board of Elections Commissioner request that the Petition be dismissed.


FACT: August 6, 2009: Appeared in Supreme Court with my attorney Mr. Jonathan Sennett for a hearing trial.

FACT: August 7, 2009: Received acknowledgement from my Attorney Mr. Sennett the ruling as it related to this case at 4:45pm. I have not had the opportunity to review the ruling which is pending our review and I really can’t speak to this issue at this time.

These are the facts. I did not attack anyone in my presentation and therefore the judicial system is in control of the outcome. I respect them in their decision making. This does not mean I agree but respect is earned for the professionals defending the public.





9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Jean,

I didn't get to read all of this. I am rushed for time. However, I did want to invite you to attend - whatever has gone on - to the "Patriot Day / Meet the Candidates / KAPA Fundraiser" on Saturday, Sept. 12. Please see my blog at http://www.flingingtowardsthesun.blogspot.com for the details.

[I will come back and read this later. I hope you are doing okay!]

N.S.

PW said...

It boils down to this as far as I'm concerned. There were two jobs you wanted to have so you applied for both of them hoping to get only one, not both obviously. You filled out the applications and waited to hear the results which came down to alderwoman in this case. The fact that you would make an excellent advocate for the people in your ward goes without saying.

The hot air coming from the hypocritical Cahill clan is no surprise especially with the court petition filed to knock you out of the race. I hope you appeal and that the judge vacates the decision he made since it was not made impartially it seems. There should not a law against trying to see which office one chooses to run for since in federal races the runner up usually is selected as the VP except for Sarah Palin and the Republicans.

I have known you, Jean, for over 4 decades and although I am not part of the same political party, I would vote for you in any race you decided to run in, provided I was an eligble voter. The public access personas or cults of personality that are not slugging it out anymore locally might be a blessing in disguise because we know it would have more than mild repercussions. We have spoken on your show many times and your call to volunteer shows your true character only wanting to do the best for your fellow citizens. I applaud your efforts and stand by you. PW

PW said...

Jean,

I don't know if your schedule allows you enough time to read and review all the posts to your blog spot so I will submit this again at the risk of repeating my attempt to stand behind your noble efforts to be community-minded and wanting to serve your fellow citizens. Here is the first one that I sent to you some days ago:

"It boils down to this as far as I'm concerned. There were two jobs you wanted to have so you applied for both of them hoping to get only one, not both obviously. You filled out the "job applications" and waited to hear the results which came down to alderwoman in this case. The fact that you would make an excellent advocate for the people in your ward goes without saying. The hot air coming from the hypocritical Cahill clan is no surprise especially with the court petition filed to knock you out of the race.
I hope you appeal and that the judge vacates the decision he made since it was not made impartially it seems.

There should not a law against trying to see which office one chooses to run for since in presidential federal races the runner up usually is selected as the VP except for Sarah Palin and the Republicans. I have known you, Jean, for over 5 decades and although I am not part of the same political party, I would vote for you in any race you decided to run in, provided I was an eligble voter. The public access personas or cults of personality that are not slugging it out anymore locally might be a blessing in disguise because we know it would have more than mild repercussions. We have spoken on your show many times and your call to volunteer shows your true character only wanting to do the best for your fellow citizens."

All I can say is keep up the good fight and don't let the negative efforts of self-serving egomaniacs disturb you. PW

Anonymous said...

Jean one would think that you would have a little more time to keep us informed on the issues now that you are not running for office unless of course you are going to be an independent candidate. That would be just silly Jean and a waste of your time and energy. Be the people's choice by helping them directly behind the scenes. Public office just doesn't look to be in the cards for you.

Anonymous said...

What, Jean? Not posting comments anymore? You should now have PLENTY of time for your blog since you aren't allowed to run for anything... Unless your submitting yet ANOTHER set of petitions!

Anonymous said...

COME ON, JEAN! NO COMMENT?!?

HAVEN'T YA' GOT ANYTHING TA' SAY?!?

HMMM?!?

Jacobs Live People for People said...

A PUBLIC SERVANT
Many of you should be ashamed to think that I would ever deceive my public. Get your facts straight: I am not allowed to run for anything: Absolutely mistruth. Where do you people come up with these statements?

When I campaigned with the people I educated them with the facts about my platform if elected. Honesty, pride, unity, trust, integrity, respect and the ability to work together in the best interest of the people will always be my MISSION. As public officials we are to busy attacking each other and we forget the importance of working together in order to make a difference for the people. "For those to whom much is given, much is required"

Anonymous said...

Jean,

Who are you supporting for ward five alderman? Come on, say his name, Jean.

Anonymous said...

Jacobs your comments at 7:12 tell me that you are indeed fool enough to be an independent candidate. Very sad. Very devisive. Very unrepublican. You realize what this will mean if the new by-laws are passed as is, right?